Bambu Lab P2S vs Qidi Q1 Pro

  • The Bambu Lab P2S wins, 9.2 vs 8 out of 10.
  • P2S prints 1.2× the volume (256³ ÷ 245×245×240 = 1.16) for more money.
  • Qidi Q1 Pro is faster, 600 vs 500 mm/s.
  • Pick the Qidi Q1 Pro if your prints fit in 24 cm.

Specs from the PrintPick catalog, checked 2026-09-29. Scores are PrintPick ratings out of 10.

The verdict

Buy the P2S.

9.2/10 vs Qidi Q1 Pro's 8/10, and it wins 4 of 5 categories. Best enclosed CoreXY under $600 right now. New buyers: this is the answer, skip the P1S comparison. P1S owners: the nozzle system and AMS 2 Pro drying tip the scales toward upgrading, but only if you use those features regularly.

Specs, side by side

Teal wins the row.

P2SBambu Lab · FDM
vs
Qidi Q1 ProQidi Tech · FDM
P2S and Qidi Q1 Pro compared: specs
P2SSpecQidi Q1 Pro
16.8 L (wins)Build volume14.4 L
500 mm/sTop speed600 mm/s (wins)
0.05 mm (wins)Finest layer0.1 mm
14.9 kgWeight20.3 kg

Features

Features of the P2S and Qidi Q1 Pro
P2SFeatureQidi Q1 Pro
YesEnclosed CoreXYNo
YesAMS 2 Pro compatibleNo
Yes5-inch touchscreenNo
Yes1080p AI cameraNo
YesQuick-swap nozzle systemNo
YesPMSM servo extruder (8.5kg force)No
NoEnclosed CoreXY with 60C heated chamberYes
No350C tri-metal hotendYes
NoWiFi 6 + LAN connectivityYes
No1080p camera with timelapseYes
NoDual Z-axis motorsYes
No120C heated bedYes

Scores out of 10

P2S and Qidi Q1 Pro compared: PrintPick scores out of 10
P2SSpecQidi Q1 Pro
9 (wins)Value8
9 (wins)Beginner Friendliness7
10 (wins)Print Quality9
9Speed9
9 (wins)Reliability7
9.2 (wins)Overall8

Build space, front view, to one scale

  • 256 × 256 × 256 mm
  • 245 × 245 × 240 mm

What owners say

  • The quick nozzle swap makes me jealous even as an X1C owner.
    P2S owner, r/BambuLab
  • Goldilocks gets a glow up. The P2S refreshes a best seller with meaningful upgrades.
    P2S owner, Tom's Hardware
  • For new buyers, the P2S is recommended without hesitation. Meaningfully better than the P1S in every way.
    P2S owner, 3DTechValley
  • Turn up the heat. The Q1 Pro brings industrial-grade chamber heating to the consumer market.
    Qidi Q1 Pro owner, Tom's Hardware
  • A heated value. Consumer 3D printer with industrial capabilities at a fraction of the cost.
    Qidi Q1 Pro owner, 3DPrint.com
  • The heated chamber is a game changer for ABS and nylon. Just wish the firmware was more polished.
    Qidi Q1 Pro owner, r/3Dprinting

Pros & Cons

P2S

  • +Quick-swap nozzle: no tools, no waiting for cool-down, no thread damage from hot-tightening
  • +1080p AI camera pauses the print when it detects layer failures, not just notifies you
  • +AMS 2 Pro dries filament while printing so you don't need a separate drybox for standard materials
  • −No LiDAR sensor: that capability is still exclusive to the X-series
  • −P1S owners have no trade-in path; the upgrade cost is the full price

Qidi Q1 Pro

  • +60C chamber heating: ABS, nylon, and PC without warping
  • +350C hotend handles every engineering filament you'll throw at it
  • +WiFi 6, 1080p monitoring, timelapse built in
  • −Exposed heater is a genuine safety concern, not just a nitpick
  • −Casing feels cheaper than the spec sheet suggests

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Bambu Lab P2S better than the Qidi Q1 Pro?

By the numbers, the Bambu Lab P2S scores higher (9.2/10). But "better" depends on your use case, the Qidi Q1 Pro may be the smarter buy if you need enclosed.

Which is better for beginners, Bambu Lab P2S or Qidi Q1 Pro?

The Bambu Lab P2S is more beginner-friendly (9/10 vs 7/10) with easier setup and a gentler learning curve.

Is the Bambu Lab P2S worth paying more for over the Qidi Q1 Pro?

The Bambu Lab P2S scores higher overall (9.2/10 vs 8/10). The extra money gets you quick-swap nozzle: no tools, no waiting for cool-down, no thread damage from hot-tightening.

What's the main difference between Bambu Lab P2S and Qidi Q1 Pro?

Build volume (256x256x256mm vs 245x245x240mm) and print speed (500 vs 600 mm/s). The Bambu Lab P2S is best for speed; the Qidi Q1 Pro targets enclosed.

Related Comparisons