Bambu Lab X2D vs QIDI X-Plus 3

  • The Bambu Lab X2D wins, 8.8 vs 8.4 out of 10.
  • X-Plus 3 prints 1.2× the volume (280×280×270 ÷ 256×256×260 = 1.24) and costs less.
  • Same 600 mm/s top speed.
  • Pick the X2D if your prints fit in 26 cm.

Specs from the PrintPick catalog, checked 2026-09-29. Scores are PrintPick ratings out of 10.

The verdict

Buy the X2D.

8.8/10 vs X-Plus 3's 8.4/10, and it wins 3 of 5 categories. The X2D kills the gap that used to exist between the P2S and the H2D. For a little more than a P2S you get dual nozzles, active chamber heating, and a servo extruder with flow sensing. The Combo is the sweet spot for serious hobbyists. Most aggressively priced printer launch of 2026.

Specs, side by side

Teal wins the row.

X2DBambu Lab · FDM
vs
X-Plus 3QIDI · FDM
X2D and X-Plus 3 compared: specs
X2DSpecX-Plus 3
17.0 LBuild volume21.2 L (wins)
600 mm/sTop speed600 mm/s
0.05 mmFinest layer0.05 mm
22 kgWeight17 kg

Features

Features of the X2D and X-Plus 3
X2DFeatureX-Plus 3
YesDual extruder (direct drive + bowden)No
Yes65C actively heated chamberNo
Yes300C hotend with servo extruder and real-time flow sensingNo
YesOptional Vision Encoder (50-micron motion accuracy)No
Yes31 sensors monitoring feed path, thermals, and safetyNo
YesAI camera with failure detectionNo
YesAMS 2 Pro compatibleNo
YesStainless steel linear railsNo
Yes3-stage air filtration (G3 + H12 HEPA + activated carbon)No
YesSub-50dB noise levelNo
NoEnclosedYes
NoCoreXYYes
NoChamber heating (60C)Yes
NoAuto bed levelingYes
NoWiFiYes
NoCameraYes

Scores out of 10

X2D and X-Plus 3 compared: PrintPick scores out of 10
X2DSpecX-Plus 3
8Value9 (wins)
7Beginner Friendliness7
10 (wins)Print Quality9
10 (wins)Speed9
9 (wins)Reliability8
8.8 (wins)Overall8.4

Build space, front view, to one scale

  • 256 × 256 × 260 mm
  • 280 × 280 × 270 mm

What owners say

  • Exceptional print quality, material compatibility, and all at a superb price.
    X2D owner, TechRadar
  • Improving a fan favorite. The X2D delivers where it counts.
    X2D owner, Tom's Hardware
  • Active chamber heating to 60C at this price? QIDI is quietly winning the enclosed printer game.
    X-Plus 3 owner, r/3Dprinting
  • The X-Plus 3 handles Nylon and PC better than printers costing twice as much.
    X-Plus 3 owner, Edge of Tech (YouTube)

Pros & Cons

X2D

  • +Dual nozzle at a third of what the H2D costs
  • +65C heated chamber handles any engineering material you'll realistically use
  • +31 sensors and a servo extruder with real-time flow compensation
  • −Same build volume as the P2S, not the H2D's bigger 325mm
  • −Dual-extrusion mode shrinks the usable X to around 235.5mm

X-Plus 3

  • +60C active chamber heating is the real feature: ABS stops warping, Nylon actually sticks
  • +Handles PA, PC, and carbon-fiber composites without drama
  • +CoreXY at 600mm/s inside a heated enclosure is genuinely rare under $600
  • −QIDI's slicer software feels like 2020: functional but not pleasant
  • −Community is small; problems require more DIY solving than Bambu or Creality

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Bambu Lab X2D better than the QIDI X-Plus 3?

By the numbers, the Bambu Lab X2D scores higher (8.8/10). But "better" depends on your use case, the QIDI X-Plus 3 may be the smarter buy if you need engineering.

Which is better for beginners, Bambu Lab X2D or QIDI X-Plus 3?

Both score 7/10 for beginners. Go with the QIDI X-Plus 3, the cheaper of the two.

Is the Bambu Lab X2D worth paying more for over the QIDI X-Plus 3?

The Bambu Lab X2D scores higher overall (8.8/10 vs 8.4/10). The extra money gets you dual nozzle at a third of what the h2d costs.

What's the main difference between Bambu Lab X2D and QIDI X-Plus 3?

Build volume (256x256x260mm vs 280x280x270mm) and print speed (600 vs 600 mm/s). The Bambu Lab X2D is best for professional; the QIDI X-Plus 3 targets engineering.

Related Comparisons