Prusa MK4S vs QIDI X-Smart 3

  • The QIDI X-Smart 3 wins, 8 vs 7.8 out of 10.
  • Prusa MK4S prints 2.3× the volume (250×210×220 ÷ 175×175×165 = 2.29) for $580 ($929 − $349) more.
  • X-Smart 3 is faster, 600 vs 200 mm/s.
  • Pick the X-Smart 3 if your prints fit in 16.5 cm.

Specs and US prices from the PrintPick catalog, checked 2026-09-29. Scores are PrintPick ratings out of 10.

The verdict

Buy the X-Smart 3.

8/10 vs Prusa MK4S's 7.8/10, and it wins 2 of 5 categories. The right machine if space is the primary constraint and you want an enclosure. A full desk-sized printer won't fit in a dorm room; this one does. The 175mm volume is the genuine trade-off.

Specs, side by side

Teal wins the row.

Prusa MK4SPrusa Research · FDM
vs
X-Smart 3QIDI · FDM
Prusa MK4S and X-Smart 3 compared: specs
Prusa MK4SSpecX-Smart 3
$929Price$349 (wins)
11.6 L (wins)Build volume5.1 L
200 mm/sTop speed600 mm/s (wins)
0.05 mmFinest layer0.05 mm
7 kgWeight9.5 kg

Features

Features of the Prusa MK4S and X-Smart 3
Prusa MK4SFeatureX-Smart 3
YesOpen sourceNo
YesPrusaSlicerNo
YesNextruderNo
YesAuto bed levelingYes
YesInput shapingNo
YesEthernetNo
NoEnclosed CoreXYYes
NoChamber heating (35C)Yes
NoWiFiYes
NoCameraYes

Value math

$929 ÷ 11.6 L and $349 ÷ 5.1 L. Lower is more printer for the money.

Prusa MK4S and X-Smart 3 compared: price per liter of build volume and per mm/s of speed
Prusa MK4SSpecX-Smart 3
$80.43$ per liter$69.07 (wins)
$4.64$ per mm/s$0.58 (wins)

Scores out of 10

Prusa MK4S and X-Smart 3 compared: PrintPick scores out of 10
Prusa MK4SSpecX-Smart 3
6Value8 (wins)
8Beginner Friendliness8
9 (wins)Print Quality8
6Speed8 (wins)
10 (wins)Reliability8
7.8Overall8 (wins)

Build space, front view, to one scale

  • 250 × 210 × 220 mm
  • 175 × 175 × 165 mm

What owners say

  • My MK3 ran for 5 years without a single failed print. The MK4S continues that legacy.
    Prusa MK4S owner, r/prusa3d
  • If reliability is your #1 priority, nothing beats Prusa. Nothing.
    Prusa MK4S owner, Thomas Sanladerer (YouTube)
  • Enclosed CoreXY that fits on a small desk. QIDI nailed the compact premium market.
    X-Smart 3 owner, r/3Dprinting
  • The X-Smart 3 is the printer I recommend when people ask for a quiet, enclosed machine that's not huge.
    X-Smart 3 owner, Edge of Tech (YouTube)

Pros & Cons

Prusa MK4S

  • +Prusa's QC is genuinely better than anyone else's: every printer is test-printed before shipping
  • +PrusaSlicer is open source and powerful, no subscription, no cloud required
  • +Customer support answers in hours, not weeks
  • −200mm/s max is a third of what CoreXY machines do at half the price
  • −$929 for an open-frame bed-slinger is a hard sell in 2025

X-Smart 3

  • +Fully enclosed CoreXY in a footprint smaller than most open-frame printers
  • +35C chamber heating helps layer adhesion on ABS and PETG without a full 60C setup
  • +QIDI's slicer is better than Creality's for enclosed use cases
  • −175mm cube is the real ceiling: anything larger needs to be split and assembled
  • −QIDI's community is a fraction of Bambu's or Creality's size

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Prusa MK4S better than the QIDI X-Smart 3?

By the numbers, the QIDI X-Smart 3 scores higher (8/10). But "better" depends on your use case, the Prusa MK4S may be the smarter buy if you need reliability.

Which is better for beginners, Prusa MK4S or QIDI X-Smart 3?

Both score 8/10 for beginners. Go with the QIDI X-Smart 3 to save $580.

Is the Prusa MK4S worth $580 more than the QIDI X-Smart 3?

The QIDI X-Smart 3 actually scores higher (8/10) despite costing $580 less. The Prusa MK4S only makes sense if you specifically need reliability.

What's the main difference between Prusa MK4S and QIDI X-Smart 3?

Build volume (250x210x220mm vs 175x175x165mm) and print speed (200 vs 600 mm/s). The Prusa MK4S is best for reliability; the QIDI X-Smart 3 targets compact.

Related Comparisons