QIDI X-Smart 3 vs Sovol SV08

  • The QIDI X-Smart 3 wins, 8 vs 7.8 out of 10.
  • SV08 prints 9.7× the volume (350×350×400 ÷ 175×175×165 = 9.70) for $130 ($479 − $349) more.
  • SV08 is faster, 700 vs 600 mm/s.
  • Pick the X-Smart 3 if your prints fit in 16.5 cm.

Specs and US prices from the PrintPick catalog, checked 2026-09-29. Scores are PrintPick ratings out of 10.

The verdict

Buy the X-Smart 3.

8/10 vs SV08's 7.8/10, and it wins 2 of 5 categories. The right machine if space is the primary constraint and you want an enclosure. A full desk-sized printer won't fit in a dorm room; this one does. The 175mm volume is the genuine trade-off.

Specs, side by side

Teal wins the row.

X-Smart 3QIDI · FDM
vs
SV08Sovol · FDM
X-Smart 3 and SV08 compared: specs
X-Smart 3SpecSV08
$349 (wins)Price$479
5.1 LBuild volume49.0 L (wins)
600 mm/sTop speed700 mm/s (wins)
0.05 mmFinest layer0.05 mm
9.5 kgWeight20 kg

Features

Features of the X-Smart 3 and SV08
X-Smart 3FeatureSV08
YesEnclosed CoreXYNo
YesChamber heating (35C)No
YesAuto bed levelingYes
YesWiFiNo
YesCameraNo
NoVoron-inspired CoreXYYes
NoKlipperYes
No350mm build volumeYes
NoOpen designYes

Value math

$349 ÷ 5.1 L and $479 ÷ 49.0 L. Lower is more printer for the money.

X-Smart 3 and SV08 compared: price per liter of build volume and per mm/s of speed
X-Smart 3SpecSV08
$69.07$ per liter$9.78 (wins)
$0.58 (wins)$ per mm/s$0.68

Scores out of 10

X-Smart 3 and SV08 compared: PrintPick scores out of 10
X-Smart 3SpecSV08
8Value9 (wins)
8 (wins)Beginner Friendliness5
8Print Quality8
8Speed10 (wins)
8 (wins)Reliability7
8 (wins)Overall7.8

Build space, front view, to one scale

  • 175 × 175 × 165 mm
  • 350 × 350 × 400 mm

What owners say

  • Enclosed CoreXY that fits on a small desk. QIDI nailed the compact premium market.
    X-Smart 3 owner, r/3Dprinting
  • The X-Smart 3 is the printer I recommend when people ask for a quiet, enclosed machine that's not huge.
    X-Smart 3 owner, Edge of Tech (YouTube)
  • Voron performance without spending months sourcing parts and building. Sign me up.
    SV08 owner, r/VORONDesign
  • 700mm/s is no joke. This thing absolutely rips.
    SV08 owner, Nero3D (YouTube)

Pros & Cons

X-Smart 3

  • +Fully enclosed CoreXY in a footprint smaller than most open-frame printers
  • +35C chamber heating helps layer adhesion on ABS and PETG without a full 60C setup
  • +QIDI's slicer is better than Creality's for enclosed use cases
  • −175mm cube is the real ceiling: anything larger needs to be split and assembled
  • −QIDI's community is a fraction of Bambu's or Creality's size

SV08

  • +Voron 2.4 kinematics at $479 instead of $1,000+ in DIY parts and time
  • +350x350x400mm bed handles nearly anything without splitting prints
  • +700mm/s is a real number that the machine hits in practice with tuning
  • −Out-of-box calibration takes several hours for first-timers
  • −QC is inconsistent between batches: some units are great, some need work

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the QIDI X-Smart 3 better than the Sovol SV08?

By the numbers, the QIDI X-Smart 3 scores higher (8/10). But "better" depends on your use case, the Sovol SV08 may be the smarter buy if you need large-prints.

Which is better for beginners, QIDI X-Smart 3 or Sovol SV08?

The QIDI X-Smart 3 is more beginner-friendly (8/10 vs 5/10) with easier setup and a gentler learning curve.

Is the Sovol SV08 worth $130 more than the QIDI X-Smart 3?

The QIDI X-Smart 3 actually scores higher (8/10) despite costing $130 less. The Sovol SV08 only makes sense if you specifically need large-prints.

What's the main difference between QIDI X-Smart 3 and Sovol SV08?

Build volume (175x175x165mm vs 350x350x400mm) and print speed (600 vs 700 mm/s). The QIDI X-Smart 3 is best for compact; the Sovol SV08 targets large-prints.

Related Comparisons