Prusa XL vs QIDI X-Plus 3

  • The QIDI X-Plus 3 wins, 8.4 vs 6.8 out of 10.
  • Prusa XL prints 2.2× the volume (360³ ÷ 280×280×270 = 2.20) for more money.
  • X-Plus 3 is faster, 600 vs 200 mm/s.
  • Pick the X-Plus 3 if your prints fit in 27 cm.

Specs from the PrintPick catalog, checked 2026-09-29. Scores are PrintPick ratings out of 10.

The verdict

Buy the X-Plus 3.

8.4/10 vs Prusa XL's 6.8/10, and it wins 3 of 5 categories. This is the printer for ABS and Nylon at a price that doesn't hurt. The chamber heating is the feature: everything else at this price is warping-mitigation theater. If you're printing PLA only, look elsewhere. If ABS is part of your workflow, look here first.

Specs, side by side

Teal wins the row.

Prusa XLPrusa Research · FDM
vs
X-Plus 3QIDI · FDM
Prusa XL and X-Plus 3 compared: specs
Prusa XLSpecX-Plus 3
46.7 L (wins)Build volume21.2 L
200 mm/sTop speed600 mm/s (wins)
0.05 mmFinest layer0.05 mm
25 kgWeight17 kg

Features

Features of the Prusa XL and X-Plus 3
Prusa XLFeatureX-Plus 3
YesMulti-tool (up to 5 heads)No
Yes360mm build volumeNo
YesSegmented heatbedNo
YesOpen sourceNo
YesEthernetNo
NoEnclosedYes
NoCoreXYYes
NoChamber heating (60C)Yes
NoAuto bed levelingYes
NoWiFiYes
NoCameraYes

Scores out of 10

Prusa XL and X-Plus 3 compared: PrintPick scores out of 10
Prusa XLSpecX-Plus 3
5Value9 (wins)
5Beginner Friendliness7 (wins)
10 (wins)Print Quality9
5Speed9 (wins)
9 (wins)Reliability8
6.8Overall8.4 (wins)

Build space, front view, to one scale

  • 360 × 360 × 360 mm
  • 280 × 280 × 270 mm

What owners say

  • True tool-changing is a different league from filament swapping. The XL actually delivers.
    Prusa XL owner, r/prusa3d
  • The most capable consumer printer ever made. If you need it, you know you need it.
    Prusa XL owner, CNC Kitchen (YouTube)
  • Active chamber heating to 60C at this price? QIDI is quietly winning the enclosed printer game.
    X-Plus 3 owner, r/3Dprinting
  • The X-Plus 3 handles Nylon and PC better than printers costing twice as much.
    X-Plus 3 owner, Edge of Tech (YouTube)

Pros & Cons

Prusa XL

  • +5 independent tool heads means true material switching, not color blending on a single hotend
  • +360mm cube handles parts that can't be split and glued
  • +Segmented heated bed powers down unused zones, saving real electricity on large prints
  • −At this price you still print at 200mm/s: the speed is hard to accept at this price
  • −Delivery times have been 2-4 months; plan accordingly

X-Plus 3

  • +60C active chamber heating is the real feature: ABS stops warping, Nylon actually sticks
  • +Handles PA, PC, and carbon-fiber composites without drama
  • +CoreXY at 600mm/s inside a heated enclosure is genuinely rare under $600
  • −QIDI's slicer software feels like 2020: functional but not pleasant
  • −Community is small; problems require more DIY solving than Bambu or Creality

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Prusa XL better than the QIDI X-Plus 3?

By the numbers, the QIDI X-Plus 3 scores higher (8.4/10). But "better" depends on your use case, the Prusa XL may be the smarter buy if you need professional.

Which is better for beginners, Prusa XL or QIDI X-Plus 3?

The QIDI X-Plus 3 is more beginner-friendly (7/10 vs 5/10) with easier setup and a gentler learning curve.

Is the Prusa XL worth paying more for over the QIDI X-Plus 3?

The QIDI X-Plus 3 actually scores higher (8.4/10) despite costing less. The Prusa XL only makes sense if you specifically need professional.

What's the main difference between Prusa XL and QIDI X-Plus 3?

Build volume (360x360x360mm vs 280x280x270mm) and print speed (200 vs 600 mm/s). The Prusa XL is best for professional; the QIDI X-Plus 3 targets engineering.

Related Comparisons