Prusa MK4S vs QIDI X-Plus 3

  • The QIDI X-Plus 3 wins, 8.4 vs 7.8 out of 10.
  • X-Plus 3 prints 1.8× the volume (280×280×270 ÷ 250×210×220 = 1.83) and costs $430 ($929 − $499) less.
  • X-Plus 3 is faster, 600 vs 200 mm/s.
  • Pick the Prusa MK4S if your prints fit in 22 cm.

Specs and US prices from the PrintPick catalog, checked 2026-09-29. Scores are PrintPick ratings out of 10.

The verdict

Buy the X-Plus 3.

8.4/10 vs Prusa MK4S's 7.8/10, and it wins 2 of 5 categories. This is the printer for ABS and Nylon at a price that doesn't hurt. The chamber heating is the feature: everything else at this price is warping-mitigation theater. If you're printing PLA only, look elsewhere. If ABS is part of your workflow, look here first.

Specs, side by side

Teal wins the row.

Prusa MK4SPrusa Research · FDM
vs
X-Plus 3QIDI · FDM
Prusa MK4S and X-Plus 3 compared: specs
Prusa MK4SSpecX-Plus 3
$929Price$499 (wins)
11.6 LBuild volume21.2 L (wins)
200 mm/sTop speed600 mm/s (wins)
0.05 mmFinest layer0.05 mm
7 kgWeight17 kg

Features

Features of the Prusa MK4S and X-Plus 3
Prusa MK4SFeatureX-Plus 3
YesOpen sourceNo
YesPrusaSlicerNo
YesNextruderNo
YesAuto bed levelingYes
YesInput shapingNo
YesEthernetNo
NoEnclosedYes
NoCoreXYYes
NoChamber heating (60C)Yes
NoWiFiYes
NoCameraYes

Value math

$929 ÷ 11.6 L and $499 ÷ 21.2 L. Lower is more printer for the money.

Prusa MK4S and X-Plus 3 compared: price per liter of build volume and per mm/s of speed
Prusa MK4SSpecX-Plus 3
$80.43$ per liter$23.57 (wins)
$4.64$ per mm/s$0.83 (wins)

Scores out of 10

Prusa MK4S and X-Plus 3 compared: PrintPick scores out of 10
Prusa MK4SSpecX-Plus 3
6Value9 (wins)
8 (wins)Beginner Friendliness7
9Print Quality9
6Speed9 (wins)
10 (wins)Reliability8
7.8Overall8.4 (wins)

Build space, front view, to one scale

  • 250 × 210 × 220 mm
  • 280 × 280 × 270 mm

What owners say

  • My MK3 ran for 5 years without a single failed print. The MK4S continues that legacy.
    Prusa MK4S owner, r/prusa3d
  • If reliability is your #1 priority, nothing beats Prusa. Nothing.
    Prusa MK4S owner, Thomas Sanladerer (YouTube)
  • Active chamber heating to 60C at this price? QIDI is quietly winning the enclosed printer game.
    X-Plus 3 owner, r/3Dprinting
  • The X-Plus 3 handles Nylon and PC better than printers costing twice as much.
    X-Plus 3 owner, Edge of Tech (YouTube)

Pros & Cons

Prusa MK4S

  • +Prusa's QC is genuinely better than anyone else's: every printer is test-printed before shipping
  • +PrusaSlicer is open source and powerful, no subscription, no cloud required
  • +Customer support answers in hours, not weeks
  • −200mm/s max is a third of what CoreXY machines do at half the price
  • −$929 for an open-frame bed-slinger is a hard sell in 2025

X-Plus 3

  • +60C active chamber heating is the real feature: ABS stops warping, Nylon actually sticks
  • +Handles PA, PC, and carbon-fiber composites without drama
  • +CoreXY at 600mm/s inside a heated enclosure is genuinely rare under $600
  • −QIDI's slicer software feels like 2020: functional but not pleasant
  • −Community is small; problems require more DIY solving than Bambu or Creality

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Prusa MK4S better than the QIDI X-Plus 3?

By the numbers, the QIDI X-Plus 3 scores higher (8.4/10). But "better" depends on your use case, the Prusa MK4S may be the smarter buy if you need reliability.

Which is better for beginners, Prusa MK4S or QIDI X-Plus 3?

The Prusa MK4S is more beginner-friendly (8/10 vs 7/10) with easier setup and a gentler learning curve.

Is the Prusa MK4S worth $430 more than the QIDI X-Plus 3?

The QIDI X-Plus 3 actually scores higher (8.4/10) despite costing $430 less. The Prusa MK4S only makes sense if you specifically need reliability.

What's the main difference between Prusa MK4S and QIDI X-Plus 3?

Build volume (250x210x220mm vs 280x280x270mm) and print speed (200 vs 600 mm/s). The Prusa MK4S is best for reliability; the QIDI X-Plus 3 targets engineering.

Related Comparisons