QIDI iBox Mono2 vs QIDI X-Smart 3

  • The QIDI X-Smart 3 takes the crown with 8/10 vs 6.4/10.
  • It pulls ahead in Value, Beginner Friendliness, Print Quality, Speed, Reliability.
  • That said, the QIDI iBox Mono2 costs less.

Specs from the PrintPick catalog, checked 2026-09-29. Scores are PrintPick ratings out of 10.

The verdict

Buy the X-Smart 3.

8/10 vs iBox Mono2's 6.4/10, and it wins 5 of 5 categories. The right machine if space is the primary constraint and you want an enclosure. A full desk-sized printer won't fit in a dorm room; this one does. The 175mm volume is the genuine trade-off.

Specs, side by side

Teal wins the row.

iBox Mono2QIDI · RESIN
vs
X-Smart 3QIDI · FDM
iBox Mono2 and X-Smart 3 compared: specs
iBox Mono2SpecX-Smart 3
1.6 LBuild volume5.1 L (wins)
90 mm/sTop speed600 mm/s
0.01 mm (wins)Finest layer0.05 mm
5.2 kgWeight9.5 kg

Features

Features of the iBox Mono2 and X-Smart 3
iBox Mono2FeatureX-Smart 3
Yes4K mono LCDNo
YesEnclosed designNo
YesWiFiYes
YesCompact form factorNo
NoEnclosed CoreXYYes
NoChamber heating (35C)Yes
NoAuto bed levelingYes
NoCameraYes

Scores out of 10

iBox Mono2 and X-Smart 3 compared: PrintPick scores out of 10
iBox Mono2SpecX-Smart 3
7Value8 (wins)
6Beginner Friendliness8 (wins)
7Print Quality8 (wins)
5Speed8 (wins)
7Reliability8 (wins)
6.4Overall8 (wins)

Build space, front view, to one scale

  • 120 × 68 × 200 mm
  • 175 × 175 × 165 mm

What owners say

  • The enclosed design is the killer feature. My apartment doesn't smell like a resin factory anymore.
    iBox Mono2 owner, r/resinprinting
  • Niche pick, but if you share a small space, the enclosure is worth it.
    iBox Mono2 owner, r/PrintedMinis
  • Enclosed CoreXY that fits on a small desk. QIDI nailed the compact premium market.
    X-Smart 3 owner, r/3Dprinting
  • The X-Smart 3 is the printer I recommend when people ask for a quiet, enclosed machine that's not huge.
    X-Smart 3 owner, Edge of Tech (YouTube)

Pros & Cons

iBox Mono2

  • +Enclosed design contains resin fumes better than open printers without relying solely on a purifier
  • +WiFi standard, unlike some competitors at this price
  • +QIDI build quality is solid and consistent
  • −4K resolution is significantly behind competitors offering 9K at the same price
  • −120x68mm build volume is one of the smallest in the category

X-Smart 3

  • +Fully enclosed CoreXY in a footprint smaller than most open-frame printers
  • +35C chamber heating helps layer adhesion on ABS and PETG without a full 60C setup
  • +QIDI's slicer is better than Creality's for enclosed use cases
  • −175mm cube is the real ceiling: anything larger needs to be split and assembled
  • −QIDI's community is a fraction of Bambu's or Creality's size

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the QIDI iBox Mono2 better than the QIDI X-Smart 3?

By the numbers, the QIDI X-Smart 3 scores higher (8/10). But "better" depends on your use case, the QIDI iBox Mono2 may be the smarter buy if you need resin.

Which is better for beginners, QIDI iBox Mono2 or QIDI X-Smart 3?

The QIDI X-Smart 3 is more beginner-friendly (8/10 vs 6/10) with easier setup and a gentler learning curve.

Is the QIDI X-Smart 3 worth paying more for over the QIDI iBox Mono2?

The QIDI X-Smart 3 scores higher overall (8/10 vs 6.4/10). The extra money gets you fully enclosed corexy in a footprint smaller than most open-frame printers.

What's the main difference between QIDI iBox Mono2 and QIDI X-Smart 3?

Technology: the QIDI iBox Mono2 is RESIN (filament) and the QIDI X-Smart 3 is FDM (resin). FDM prints bigger functional parts; resin delivers finer surface detail.

Related Comparisons